Attack enemy bases,

• 民主党は社民党との連立を見直せ
  http://87493296.at.webry.info/200910/article_12.html
  It is necessary to make the United States think”, that it points out

  ---

  做它指出的美国认为”，那是必要的
  
  
• 衆院選公示当日の09年8月18日の各紙社説を比較する～あ、あ、朝日は民主の応援団、産経新聞は自民党、旗幟鮮明はいいことなのか？
  http://hakusanjin.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2009/08/09818-bff1.html
  That there is also the indication which you say whether the United States does not make presence be and it is not to have made Japan follow, on the other hand Japan just has fallen to the state of “thought stop” self regulation and with self-trapping is not,

  ---

  那那里也是您在另一只手日本说的征兆美国是否不做存在是，并且它不是做日本跟随，就是下落了对“想法中止”自动调整状态和与自已诱捕不是，
  
  
• 民主党の外交政策について09年7月25日朝刊各紙社説、続き物を読む～毎日新聞、朝日新聞、読売新聞、日経新聞
  http://hakusanjin.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2009/07/09725-4574.html
  It is the problem which relates to the foundation of the Japan-U.S. Security Arrangements system which has been made on the basis of that Japan is protected “the umbrella of the American with nucleus”

  ---

  它是与Japan-U.S.安全安排系统基础关连根据那日本被做了被保护“美国人伞有中坚力量的”的问题
  
  
• 湯浅博氏の対北抑止力論、ちょっと違うけど大体は賛成～産経新聞6月6日朝刊コラム［くにのあとさき］
  http://hakusanjin.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2009/06/66-6905.html
  Because Yuasa has known postwar strategic environment too much, the doctrine that “the United States in Japan cannot give strategic attack ability”, is kept, that it probably believes, but even this you do not understand

  ---

  由于Yuasa太多知道战后战略环境， “美国在日本不可能给战略攻击能力”的教条，被保留，那它大概相信，但是您不了解甚而的这