|
|
|
0 .
- ○■
redmine
- ○■
This way, because ticket drive development does not depend on the tool of specification, when in the future, development of the tool which has been utilized is discontinued, but (movement of environment is necessary) does not have the necessity to change methodology largely
- ○■
<2>As for the morni ng meeting looking back which is the practice of ticket drive development and [purojiekutohuashiriteshiyon] you think that affinity is good,
- ○■
With subversion+redmine, it made the ticket “of obstacle correction” and “merging job” separately, relation had attached mutually
- ○■
Trying using ticket drive development, as for ticket drive development and the morning meeting looking back you became aware in affinity being good
- ○■
redmine0.8.0 trac0.11.1.j a
Deviation from excel!
- ○■
The cord/code review on r eviewboard because the redmine ticket and the string [zu] it is, using the work flow management function of redmine, can manage the process for the review easily
|
|
|