Minimalism,

• 
  http://candycube.at.webry.info/201108/article_10.html
  4 my only girl brandon fraley.

  ---

  4仅我的女孩brandon fraley。
  
  
• Japanese Letter
  http://malaprop.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2009/11/timmons-mwf-1.html
  the leading ideas of contextual semantics are these: (1) the truth of a sentence is a matter of its correct assertability. (2) correct assertability, at least for ordinary descriptive sentences and is normally a matter of the often complex interaction of two factors: (a) the various normas and practices that govern a certain mode of discourse and (b) the world. (3) unlike the correspondence view, a mode of discourse often employs assertability normas that do not require, for the truth of sentences constituting that discourse, objects or properties in the world to directly answer to the sentences' singular terms, unnegated quantifier expressions and or predicates; nor need there be any dedicated facts in the world that correspond to the sentence. (4) furthermore and the norms and practices for correct assertability are not monolithic within a language; rather and these norms and practices vary from context to context depending ON such factors as the sort of discourse in question (scientific, aesthetic, moral and so forth) and the specific purposes the discourse is serving at the time. (5) although truth, in this view, is a normative notion and the view is not a form of verificationism (sometimes called and pragmatism): truth is not radically epistemic; correct assertability is not the same as warranted assertability (even ideal warranted assertability). (p. 116) (As for the capital letter inscription “of objects” and “properties” etc, in the corresponding theory of truth language (single name term, predicate,…) With mind-independent corresponds the existence person is displayed

  ---

  上下文语义学主导思想是这些： (1)句子的真相是它的正确assertability问题。 (2)正确assertability，至少普通的描写句子的和通常是二个因素的经常复杂互作用的问题： (a)治理演讲某一方式和(b)世界的各种各样的normas和实践。 (3)不同于书信视图，演讲方式经常使用不为构成那份演讲、在世界的句子真相要求，对象或者物产直接地回答到句子的单一期限，非否定的量词表示和的assertability normas或谓语; 亦不需要那里是对应于句子的所有热忱的事实在世界。 此外(4)和正确assertability的准则和实践在语言之内不是整体的; 宁可和这些准则和实践从上下文变化到上下文根据作为类演讲正在考虑中的这样因素(科学，审美，道德等等)，并且具体打算演讲当时服务。 (5)，虽然真相，在这个看法，是一个基准概念和看法不是verificationism的形式(有时叫和实效主义) ： 真相不根本地认识; 正确assertability不是相同的象被担保的assertability (甚而理想的被担保的assertability)。 (p. 116) (关于大写字母题字“对象”和“物产”等，在真相语言(唯一命名期限，谓语的对应的理论上，…) 头脑独立对应存在人被显示