Welfare state,

• Britain Resists Austerity to Cure Budget Woes
  http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/25/business/global/25welfare.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
  Britain is showing little appetite to take a knife to a welfare state that by some measures has also become the largest in Europe. With however many expedients because of the English welfare state, to take the knife which reaches maximum scale in Europe, appetite is almost shown

  ---

  Großbritannien zeigt wenig Appetit, um ein Messer zu einem Wohlfahrtsstaat zu nehmen, der durch einige Masse auch in Europa das größte geworden ist. Mit jedoch vielen Hilfsmitteln wegen des englischen Wohlfahrtsstaates, das Messer zu nehmen, das maximale Skala in Europa erreicht, wird Appetit fast gezeigt
  
  
• Britain unveils harsh spending cuts to tackle record deficit, a liberal translation
  http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/Britain-unveils-harsh-spending-cuts-to-tackle-record-deficit/articleshow/6781699.cms
  Britain said ON Wednesday it would cut half a million public sector jobs and raise the retirement age and slash the welfare state as part of the biggest spending cuts in a generation. When the age of retirement which reduces the employment of the public sector 500,000 is pulled up it made England, clear as a part of largest annual expenditure reduction of the slash welfare state generation,, a liberal translation

  ---

  Großbritannien sagte am Mittwoch, den es eine halbe Million Sektorjobs schneiden würde und das Pensionsalter aufzuwerfen und den Wohlfahrtsstaat als Teil größten zu zerschneiden Ausgabenkürzung innen ein Erzeugung. Wenn das Pensionsalter, das die Beschäftigung des öffentlichen Sektors 500.000 verringert, hochgezogen wird, bildete er England, freien Raum als Teil größte jährliche Aufwendungsverkleinerung des SchrägstrichWohlfahrtsstaaterzeugung,
  
  
• CHAN AKYA: London riots reduction lies of left to ashes
  http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/MH16Dj06.html
  London's burning shops are proof that rioters aren't sated but spoiled by welfare states and whose costs will never be recovered absent miraculous economic growth. Europeans must cut the welfare state today and or the Chinese and Indians will do it for them tomorrow. As for the store where London burns, the mob is compensated, but the cost as for absent miraculous economic growth being recovered is proof of the thing which is not made ruinous by the welfare state which is not

  ---

  Londons Burninggeschäfte sind Beweis, dass Aufständischer nicht gesättigt werden, aber durch Wohlfahrtsstaaten verdorben und dessen Kosten nie zurückgewonnenes abwesendes wundersames Wirtschaftswachstum sind. Europäer müssen den Wohlfahrtsstaat heute schneiden und oder der Chinese und die Inder tun ihn für sie morgen. Was den Speicher anbetrifft, in dem London brennt, wird der Pöbel, aber die Kosten ausgeglichen, was das abwesende wundersame Wirtschaftswachstum anbetrifft, das Beweis zurückgewonnen wird, der Sache ist, die verderblich nicht durch den Wohlfahrtsstaat gebildet wird, der nicht ist
  
  
• Food Banks Show That Government Welfare Isn't Needed
  http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2011/09/04/food-banks-show-that-government-welfare-isnt-needed/
  No and that's a little too strong but food banks do indeed show that the possibly over-weening welfare states of Europe aren't the only possible response to poverty. But calling you obtain, that is too strong just a little, as for the hood bank, certain. . u200b. . The over weening welfare state which is European possibility in u200b please show the fact that it is not possible response in only poverty, a liberal translation

  ---

  Nr. und das ist ein wenig zu starkes, aber Nahrungsmittelbanken zeigen in der Tat, dass die vielleicht maßlosen Wohlfahrtsstaaten von Europa nicht die einzige mögliche Antwort zur Armut sind. Aber, Sie anrufend, beschaffen Sie, das ist ein zu starkes gerade kleines, was die Haubenbank anbetrifft, sicher. u200b. Der weening Überwohlfahrtsstaat, der europäische Möglichkeit in u200b bitte ist, zeigen der Tatsache, dass es nicht mögliche Antwort in der nur Armut ist
  
  
• How to Make the US More Like Europe
  http://blogs.forbes.com/timworstall/2011/06/25/how-to-make-the-us-more-like-europe/
  There's a general sense ON the American left that the US should become more like Europe. A more generous and encompassing welfare state for example and perhaps less income inequality. As for the United States having become many European way there is general meaning on the American left, a liberal translation

  ---

  Es gibt eine allgemeine Richtung AUF dem amerikanischen links, dass die US eher wie Europa werden sollten. Ein großzügigerer und umgebenwohlfahrtsstaat zum Beispiel und möglicherweise weniger Einkommensverschiedenheit. Wie für die Vereinigten Staaten, die viel europäische Weise gibt es geworden werden, allgemeine Bedeutung auf dem gelassenen Amerikaner
  
  
• UK govt to stop welfare cash for some unemployed
  http://www.france24.com/en/20101111-uk-govt-stop-welfare-cash-unemployed
  , a liberal translation

  ---

  Die britische Regierung stellte eine radikale Veränderung des Wohlfahrtsstaates Donnerstag und des Sprechens vor, die er Nutzenzahlungen für bis drei Jahre von denen zurückhalten würde, die ablehnen, Jobs zu nehmen. Regierung Premierminister-David-Cameron möchte eine gleitende Skala der Strafen für die einführen, die entweder ein Jobangebot und -Ausfallen es ablehnen Sie, um sich um einen Job zu bewerben, den, sie zu geraten werden oder oben sich nicht für vorgeschriebene vierwöchentliche Arbeitsplazierungen drehen. Die Wochenzeitung 65-lbs-Arbeitslosenunterstützung wird für drei Monate von denen zurückgehalten, die irgendwelche der drei Bedingungen verletzen. Was die englische Regierung anbetrifft, dieses jeder Jobs. Was die Regierung anbetrifft des HauptStaatsministers [debitsudokiyameron], sagend, dass Sie Darstellung die nehmen, die die Tatsache verweigern, die wir möchten, dass die gleitende Skala der Strafregelungen für diese zu 3 Jahren was den Menschen anbetrifft keine Abnahme einführt, die sie in Donnerstag des grundlegenden Popup- Wohlfahrtsstaates verkündet, den sie rüttelt, die Rekrutierung, was sie oder Jobplazierungen anbetrifft der notwendigen 4 Wochen, die empfehlen, dass sie tut. Im Arbeitslosenunterstützungsaustausch der Woche 65 lbs bitte tun nicht die Quelle von 3 Monaten, die Sie an der Arbeit, die vom Übertreter der Person gesammelt wird, irgendeine von drei Bedingungen des Ausfalls anwenden?
  
  
• Can the UK afford to bail out Ireland?
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/nov/18/can-uk-bail-out-ireland
  UK citizens are facing tough times themselvesPoor old Ireland and felled horribly in the crash. It's splendid really and that British sympathy extends to a possible bail-out from George Osborne's Treasury. But one does wonder where the money is coming from and as UK citizens themselves feel the lash of austerity. Of course and many commentators continue to insist that British government cuts are not necessary. Huge debt after the second world war is their benchmark example and for that was no bar to the setting up of the welfare state. However, those same critics are also fond of insisting that they see no reason to believe that a private sector recovery will rescue us now and as the coalition envisages. Here, however and is exactly where those second world war analogies break down. Who could have imagined a possible boom, in the wake of working men returning home from war, industry moving back from munitions to private industry, technology advancing furiously and consumption beginning to rise after wartime sacrifice? Pretty much everybody and I would have thought. European debt crisisEuropean monetary unionEuropean UnionEconomic policyIrelandDeborah Orrguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds The English citizen is fearful in the accident 伐. Harsh time themselvesPoor, old Ireland, it has faced, a liberal translation

  ---

  BRITISCHE Bürger stellen starkes Zeiten themselvesPoor altes Irland und schrecklich gefällt im Abbruch gegenüber. Er ist wirklich herrlich und diese britische Sympathie verlängert auf eine mögliche Sicherheitsleistung Fiskus vom George-Osbornes. Wundert aber man, sich wohin das Geld kommt von und während BRITISCH, Bürger selbst der Peitsche der Strenge glauben. Selbstverständlich und viele Kommentatoren fahren Sie fort, zu beharren, dass britische Regierungsschnitte nicht notwendig sind. Sehr große Schuld, nachdem der zweite Weltkrieg ihr Festpunktbeispiel ist und für dieses war kein Stab zur Aufstellung des Wohlfahrtsstaates. Jedoch sind jene gleichen Kritiker auch in das Beharren vernarrt, dass sie keinen Grund sehen, dass eine Privatsektorwiederaufnahme uns jetzt und rettet wie zu glauben, die Koalition beabsichtigt. Hier gleichwohl und ist genau, wo jene Analogien des zweiten Weltkriegs aufgliedern. Wer könnte eine mögliche Hochkonjunktur, unmittelbar nach den Funktionsmännern sich vorgestellt haben, die nach Hause vom Krieg, von der Industrie zurückschieben von den Munition auf private Industrie, von der Technologie wütend voranbringen und vom Verbrauchsanfang, um nach Kriegopfer zu steigen zurückkommen? Ziemlich genau jeder und ich würden gedacht haben. Europäische Schuld crisisEuropean monetäres unionEuropean UnionEconomic policyIrelandDeborah Orrguardian.co.uk © Wächter-Nachrichten u. Mittel begrenzten 2010 | Gebrauch von diesem Inhalt ist abhängig von unseren Ausdrücken u. Bedingungen | Mehr zieht ein Der englische Staatsbürger ist im Unfall 伐 ängstlich. Raues Zeit themselvesPoor, altes Irland, hat es gegenübergestellt
  
  
• 
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2011/apr/01/morality-state-spending-welfare
  It is folly to think if we spent 10% more ON welfare we'd be 10% more moral. There's nothing ethical about creating dependenceThe question: What are the ethics of welfare reform? As an atheist intruder into this Cif belief discussion ON welfare and I should tread carefully. I don't draw my morality from a series of texts or believe that there is only one version of right and wrong. But I know what I feel - and that is huge resentment at the suggestion that our national morality is best measured by the level of government spending. It is quite easy to persuade yourself that the more the state spends and the fairer society will be - and from that deduce that people who question spending are immoral. The charge is thrown at the coalition every day: cuts and far from being a reasonable response to our national circumstances (if not the only possible one) are a tool being used deliberately by the cruel and immoral to wreck society. Liberals of all types should be able to rise above such simplicities. It seems to me palpably stupid to think that if the central state could spend 10% more and we would all be 10% more moral - and so that by spending 10% less and we will somehow diminish as a nation. This is the folly into which Gordon Brown's Treasury welfarism led us. It also accounts for the preening self-regard of parts of the British left and which rids itself of any guilt about the perpetual failure of its schemes by reminding itself that the intention was good and the spending high - but then and just never quite high enough. Nor, by the way and do I think that the opposite is automatically true. Cuts and lower spending cannot in themselves be a purifying force. The simple point is that there is no exact level of state spending that can make a society more or less moral. What matters is how the money We case 10% or more of the welfare which probably is moral thing of 10% or more you used, thinking, are foolish, a liberal translation

  ---

  Es ist die Unsinnigkeit, zum zu denken, wenn wir 10% mehr AUF Wohlfahrt aufwendeten, die wir moralischere 10% sein würden. Es gibt nichts, das über die Schaffung von dependenceThe Frage ethisch ist: Was sind die Ethik der Wohlfahrtsverbesserung? Als atheistischer Eindringling in diese Cif-Glaubensdiskussion AUF Wohlfahrt und mir sollte sorgfältig treten. Ich zeichne mein Sittlichkeitsgefühl nicht von einer Reihe Texten oder glaube, dass es nur eine Version von rechtem und von falschem gibt. Aber ich weiß, was ich glaube - und der ist sehr großer Groll am Vorschlag, dass unser nationales Sittlichkeitsgefühl gut durch das Niveau von Staatsausgaben gemessen wird. Es ist ziemlich einfach, sich zu überzeugen, dass, mehr wendet der Zustand auf und die angemessenere Gesellschaft ist - und von diesem ableiten Sie, dass Leute, die infrage stellen Ausgabe, sind unmoralisch. Die Gebühr wird an der täglichen Koalition geworfen: Schnitte und weit von Sein eine angemessene Antwort zu unseren nationalen Umständen (wenn nicht das einzige mögliche) sind ein Werkzeug, das absichtlich durch das grausame und das unmoralisch verwendet wird, um Gesellschaft zu ruinieren. Liberale aller Arten sollten in der Lage sein, über solche Einfachheit zu steigen. Es scheint mir offensichtlich dumm, zu denken dass, wenn der zentrale Zustand 10% mehr aufwenden könnte und alle wir moralischere 10% sein würden - und damit, indem 10% und uns weniger ausgeben, vermindert irgendwie als Nation. Dieses ist die Unsinnigkeit, in die Gordon Browns Fiskus Welfarism uns führte. Es erklärt auch das Putzen Selbst-betrachtet von den Teilen vom britischen links und das von jeder möglicher Schuld über den unaufhörlichen Ausfall seiner Entwürfe sich reinigt, indem es sich erinnert, dass die Absicht gut und die hohe Ausgabe - aber andererseits und gerade nie ziemlich hoch genug war. Noch, übrigens und denke ich, dass das Entgegengesetzte automatisch zutreffend ist. Schnitte und niedrigere Ausgabe können nicht in selbst eine Reinigungkraft sein. Der einfache Punkt ist, dass es kein genaues Niveau der Zustandausgabe gibt, das eine Gesellschaft mehr oder weniger bilden kann Moral. Was ausmacht, ist wie das Geld Wir Rechtssache 10% oder mehr der Wohlfahrt, die vermutlich moralische Sache von 10% ist oder mehr Sie verwendeten, denkend, sind dumm
  
  
• opinion piece , evaluation / appreciation , suggestions, discussion, debate, issues, reviews, thoughts, feedback,
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/29/germany-destroying-global-recovery
  Germans must realise their desire for a rich lifestyle will destroy everything the European Union had painstakingly constructedThe Germans are getting out of hand. First, they play a key role in causing the financial crisis. Then, just as the world starts to claw its way back to some kind of normality and they START kicking the props away. This accusation is not about fighting the second world war again or inciting xenophobia, but a reality check ON how those peace-loving, social-democratic Germans are selfishly jettisoning ailing European Union countries, starting with Greece, to maintain probably the richest and most all-embracing cradle-to-grave welfare state ON the planet. The fault lies mainly with Germany's large baby-boomer middle class and which now share the same aspirations as the aristocrats of the past - namely and a long and prosperous and supremely idle retirement. Like a rogue elephant in search of food and German investors have stripped the bark from almost every tree in the savannah. To maintain an artificially high standard of living and that promised retirement and they seem intent ON eating what remains. If we go back five years to the point where the US subprime housing boom was beginning to implode and German investors were begging for homes to buy. Not directly and that would be risky. They wanted derivatives of US home loans that could be valued and insured and traded. They had already bought billions of pounds worth of mortgage-backed securities and were ON the look out for more. Deutsche Bank was one of the biggest players in the market. German investors love bonds. They are deemed safer than shares and offer a steady return. Except that and by 2005, a steady return was not enough. They wanted double-digit returns and the likes of Goldman Sachs gave it to them in the form of the As for German the European Union makes strenuous efforts because of rich life style and it is necessary to actualize his own desire which destroys thing everything which constructedThe German has become unable to be unmanageable to, the [ma] %, a liberal translation

  ---

  Assunto para a traducao japonesa.
  
  
• May Europe's multicultural new generation succeed where we failed | Loretta Napoleoni
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/03/europe-multicultural-new-generation
  Writing to her son, Loretta Napoleoni looks forward to a continent breaking free of history's straitjacketDear Julian, Next year you're 18 and will leave secondary school and no doubt excited and at the same time worried. For the average European teenager and the future must look both bleak and exciting at the moment. Joblessness, mountains of debt and prophecies of monetary meltdown and the rare prospect of a secure professional career muddy the view. Thirty-five years ago a generation of school leavers - your parents - looked at a future equally thrilling and bleak. Coming of age in the shadow of nuclear holocaust and terrorism and this generation had to make do with double-digit inflation and unemployment. And yet it also sparked a sexual revolution and embraced communism and anti-conformism. In the 1970s, this generation also took to the streets, yelling anti-government slogans and opposing school reforms considered backward and elitist. It demanded free access to university in a continent equally ON the brink of political collapse. Then the iron curtain was raised, Germany accomplished its long-lasting dream of reunification and Europe even overcame the energy crisis. In the mid-1980s European economies had started growing again and enjoyed what appeared to be a long period of stability. But all that turned out to be one gigantic illusion. Almost everyone - politicians and bankers alike - abused what shy recovery there was, profited from deregulation and offshoring and outsourced jobs abroad while dismantling the remnants of the welfare state at home. In just one generation, income inequalities threw us back to the inter-war years, preparing the ground for a new great depression and only this time right ON our doorstep. What went wrong? Our endemic desire to be part of an elite and to be differe When entry and [roretsuta] Napoleoni to her son are used, 18 leaving junior high school it has done, the continent which breaks the freedom of straitjacketDear [jiyurian] of history, next year, as for excitation worry % that you are not wrong,

  ---

  Assunto para a traducao japonesa.
  
  
• Japanese Letter
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/oct/23/french-lessons-pension-protests-editorial
  As the welfare state is rolled back all over Europe and a cause is being fought in France which we would do well to watchThere is at least one difference between May '68 and what has been happening in France for the last 11 days. In '68 the protest by workers and students erupted after a prolonged period of unprecedented economic growth. Today mass protest follows decades of high unemployment - particularly for the Young. In the last two years it has risen by 17% for the under-25s. The social ladder in France is broken. Little wonder that among the millions of demonstrators who have turned out against President Nicolas Sarkozy's pension reforms - at one point one in 20 of all the people in France - tens of thousands are sixth-formers. Behind the pensions revolt is a deep fear of unemployment which will only be worsened by workers delaying retirement. Before we in Britain scoff too quickly at the French for racing to the barricades to preserve a pension system which, to our eyes, looks generous and it is worth being clear about what is being fought over and what is not. There is a broad consensus, and has been for at least seven years and that the French pension system is bust. In a pay-as-you-go system and too few active workers are paying for too many pensioners. As the number of pensioners is set to increase from 15 million in 2008 to nearly 23 million in 2050, the ratio of active workers to pensioners will reduction still further. Depending ON both the rate of long-term unemployment and labour productivity, the deficit in the state pension system, currently running at €32bn or 1.7% of GDP and could explode in the next decade to reach something more like 3% of GDP. That is a lot for any state to pay ON pensions. The issue is not whether this system should be reformed but how. Who is to s As for welfare state, in order European every place rollback to be done, as for cause, France us watchThere is good, probably is being, it fought, May which is done. . u0026#39; 68, [hu] some last 11 days %

  ---

  Assunto para a traducao japonesa.
  
  
• Protest in France: Reform and reaction | Editorial
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/sep/08/france-protests-reform-editorial
  This is a make-or-break moment for the unions and for Nicolas Sarkozy and who sees a pensions victory as the centrepiece of a range of reformsFrench unions were out ON the streets yesterday hoping to repeat their past success in defeating plans to reduction the pension entitlement of French workers. After all, they forced a previous president, Jacques Chirac, to retreat ON pensions and as well as bringing down one of his prime ministers ON the issue. So this is a make-or-break moment for the unions and for Nicolas Sarkozy and who sees a pensions victory as the centrepiece of a range of reforms which will transform his faltering presidency. As the French assembly begins an extraordinary session to decide ON changes to the pensions system, while the senate considers budget cuts, a new security law and a law to ban the burqa and there is a sense that France faces dangerous choices. If the reforms go through unmodified the country will have diluted welfare state achievements and cut its responsibilities to citizens and at the same time as it becomes a more hard-faced society for migrants and minorities. ON the other hand, if Sarkozy's reforms are derailed and that could wreck what remains of his presidency and might even bring about the credit downgrading which all European governments fear so much. Sarkozy wants to raise the age at which workers can choose to retire by two years to 62 and the age when they get a FULL pension from 65 to 67. France's pension provisions are more generous than those of most of its neighbours. Trimming them a little might seem to outsiders not unreasonable, given that the pensions burden is steadily becoming less sustainable as the ratio of retirees to people in work worsens and which it is doing everywhere in Europe. But that is to ignore the French left's fear that an As for this plan of yesterday desiring the fact that past success with tearing is repeated in order to decrease annuity, verification or rest for instantaneous union, the center of the range of [nikorasarukoji] and reformsFrench union, a liberal translation

  ---

  Assunto para a traducao japonesa.
  
  
• Japanese Letter
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/apr/06/public-service-spending-cut-banker-protest
  Since 1948, Britain has supported the principle of social solidarity through state pensions, healthcare and education and other public services provided by society as whole. This idea is now under  threat. Whoever wins the next general election will be targeting the welfare state and public services as a way of cutting public expenditure to pay for the mistakes of the bankers and speculators. Never was so much put at risk by so few. What they seem to forget is that good public services are important to everyone at every stage of their life from the cradle to grave. That is why we are supporting the demonstration in London ON 10 April to remind all politicians that a civilised, compassionate society needs a welfare state and decent public services that pool life's risks and provide support to all who need it and irrespective of their individual ability to pay. Brendan Barber TUC, Lee Billingham Love Music Hate Racism, Christine Blower NUT, Brian Caton POA, Bob Crow RMT, Jeremy Dear NUJ, Gerry Doherty TSSA, Peter Fisher NHS Consultants' Association, Dot Gibson National Pensioners Convention, Sally Hunt UCU, Tony Kearns CWU, Chris Keates NASUWT, Paul Kenny GMB, Prof Harry Keen NHS Support Federation and Jonathan Ledger Napo, Hamish Meldrum BMA, Lesley Mercer Chartered Society of Physiotherapists, Gerry Morrissey Bectu Keith Norman Aslef, Peter Pendle ACM/AMiE, Dave Prentis Unison, Alan Ritchie Ucatt, Wendy Savage Keep Our NHS Public, Mark Serwotka PCS, Eileen Short Defend Council Housing, Derek Simpson Unite, Vanessa Stanislas Disability Alliance, Christine Steel Carers Poverty Alliance, Gordon Taylor PFA, Tony Woodley Unite and Matt Wrack FBUPublic services policyTax and spendingPublic financeGeneral election 2010LabourConservativesProtestFinancial crisisguardian.co.uk © Guardi Ever since 1948, England national annuity, supports the principle of the social solidarity which is offered piblic services such as medical care and education and altogether societies

  ---

  Assunto para a traducao japonesa.