Administration in bankruptcy,

• 　Yes or no of execution hand continuation cancellation when bankruptcy hand continuation beginning decision makes after the claim seizure order announcing officially, concerning the obligator (positive)
  http://shimanami.way-nifty.com/report/2009/06/post-6cb5.html
  After that, concerning the obligator, bankruptcy hand continuation beginning decision to be done, the bankruptcy administrator, this case difference. Because you report the effect which requests the cancellation of order, execution. As for the courthouse, bankruptcy hand continuation beginning decision to be done concerning the obligator, the callous in the reason, this case difference. When field decision of the effect which cancels order is done, the complaint person it is the thing plan which does execution complaint this as dissatisfied

  ---

  
  
  
• Bankruptcy 51
  http://kazuogu.cocolog-nifty.com/samenaiuchini/2009/05/51-e884.html
  Simply, one, you do not pay attention and as for the [te] as for good thing, “the extended system of this as for free property”, it is made prerequisite that the bankruptcy administrator has been engaged,

  ---

  
  
  
• 　When simultaneous with guarantee or the guarantee on the thing, credit of the financial institution by the bankrupt it is done exchange, the mortgage offer behavior which the bankrupt does becomes the object of gratuitousness denial or, the Osaka high court 2010 February 18th decision (appeal & appeal acceptance stating stand)
  http://shimanami.way-nifty.com/report/2010/04/post-57e6.html
  In other words, as for the bankruptcy administrator of inheritance of the Chief Executive Officer, debt of the company for the bank. The Chief Executive Officer being the individual as mortgage, after the Chief Executive Officer dying before the statement of the bankruptcy hand continuation beginning for the inheritance mortgage is set concerning the behavior which in the stock which is owned, is done assuming, that it hits to the gratuitous act which makes within 6 months it is the thing plan which you deny with the bankruptcy law 160 provision 3 section, claims the value redemption of the stock proceeds from sale with mortgage right execution as returning which is decided in bankruptcy law 167 provision vis-a-vis the bank,

  ---